<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>LiquidFiles General</title>
    <description>Anything related to the LiquidFiles Server</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 01:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 01:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>LiquidFiles Forum</generator>
    <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/forums/liquidfiles-general.2/</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/forums/liquidfiles-general.2/index.rss"/>
    <item>
      <title>How to zip a file on upload</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 11:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/how-to-zip-a-file-on-upload.1984/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/how-to-zip-a-file-on-upload.1984/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Lee Jordan)</author>
      <dc:creator>Lee Jordan</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
On the <a href="https://www.liquidfiles.com/features.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">Features</a> page it says &quot;Multiple files can be automatically zip&#039;ed and downloaded as one zip archive.&quot;<br />
<br />
I can&#039;t see where to enable this feature. <br />
<br />
Can you explain how to enable this please?<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
<br />
Lee]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add red banner on the Public Share page</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 09:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-red-banner-on-the-public-share-page.1980/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-red-banner-on-the-public-share-page.1980/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Pascal de Vries)</author>
      <dc:creator>Pascal de Vries</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We are using Public Shares and we want to make it clear for internal users that upload documents to Public Shares that they are only allowed to upload unclassified documents. So we would like to have a banner in red on any Public Share page that says &quot;Please do not upload any classified documents to this Share&quot;.<br />
<br />
On the Authenticated Shares page, we should not have that banner. Can this be done by using the custom Java Script option? And if so, what should the script look like?<br />
<br />
Many thanks.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anonymous Shares: Prevent Listing</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/anonymous-shares-prevent-listing.1976/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/anonymous-shares-prevent-listing.1976/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Pascal de Vries)</author>
      <dc:creator>Pascal de Vries</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[With LF version 4.2, we got the possibility to create Anonymous (Public) Shares. Many thanks for that.<br />
<br />
We now got the situation where a department creted an Anonymous Share. We disabled the checkbox &quot;Publicly Discoverable&quot;.<br />
<br />
But now all  local users (also the ones not from that department), see 2 new things:<br />
<br />
&quot;Shares&quot; on the top<br />
A list of all anonymous Share when they click on &quot;Shares&quot;<br />
<br />
Given that all other departments cannot and should not use Shares, they should not see the &quot;Shares&quot;...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/anonymous-shares-prevent-listing.1976/" class="internalLink">Anonymous Shares: Prevent Listing</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access to download count per attachment</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 21:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/access-to-download-count-per-attachment.981/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/access-to-download-count-per-attachment.981/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Daniel Dimitrov)</author>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Dimitrov</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello,<br />
<br />
I&#039;m having automation that send multiple mails with attachments on daily basis and mail recipients are expected to download and use received files. Is there a way to extract download attachment count per message Id from the API? In &quot;Sent&quot; in the web form there is such summary, and it is more convenient to automatically aggregate such info instead of browsing through file download receipts.<br />
<br />
BR,<br />
Daniel Dimitrov]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best ways to protect drops?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 17:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/best-ways-to-protect-drops.1972/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/best-ways-to-protect-drops.1972/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Aldo)</author>
      <dc:creator>Aldo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[In July, we saw our incoming Emaildrops and Filedrops traffic increase from 2k to over 20k. Mostly from spam and phishing emails with Chinese IP addresses and domains. I was just wondering what are people doing to protect their LiquidFiles servers from spam and phishing?<br />
<br />
We&#039;re self-hosting our server in Azure and using Exchange Online as a relay (with plans to migrate to a different SMTP relay soon). So far, I&#039;ve considered: <br />
<div style="padding-left: 30px"><ul>
<li>A block rule on the firewall to block all...</li>
</ul>&#8203;</div><br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/best-ways-to-protect-drops.1972/" class="internalLink">Best ways to protect drops?</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emaildrop Help</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/emaildrop-help.1971/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/emaildrop-help.1971/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (CBHB)</author>
      <dc:creator>CBHB</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[EDIT: Ok, so good news, I figured out my own problem. Turns out, while I didn&#039;t create an MX record in Cloudflare for my LQ subdomain, M365 had somehow added the subdomain as an Accepted Domain in our tenant, so it wasn&#039;t relaying email to the LF server. <br />
<br />
I do have a question about the EmailDrop feature. Does LF use TLS when receiving the email or does that entirely depend on the sending email server? Is there a way to enforce TLS for EmailDrops?]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Root volume re-size</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 16:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/root-volume-re-size.1970/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/root-volume-re-size.1970/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Patrick)</author>
      <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi all, we have setup a liquid files instance in AWS using the AMI. We have a separate root volume and encrypted data volume. If we want to increase the root volume is it a simple process of adding disk in the AWS EC2 Volume console and then expanding this in Linux on the root volume or is it more complicated?]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSL Inspection from LF to Internet</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 19:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/ssl-inspection-from-lf-to-internet.1967/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/ssl-inspection-from-lf-to-internet.1967/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Pascal de Vries)</author>
      <dc:creator>Pascal de Vries</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We have an LF appliance in our DMZ. It connects to license.liquidfiles.com. This is allowed by our firewall.<br />
<br />
The security department now asked if the encrypted traffice to license.liquidfiles.com could be inspected, by using SSL inspection. For this, we would have to make our internal Root certificate trusted on the LF appliance.<br />
<br />
Is this a supported configuration? If so, how do I import our Root certificate, so LF trusts it?<br />
<br />
Many thanks.<br />
Pascal]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Strange new error on our LF server.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/strange-new-error-on-our-lf-server.1962/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/strange-new-error-on-our-lf-server.1962/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Dany)</author>
      <dc:creator>Dany</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello,<br />
<br />
A user reported a strange new error when he&#039;s sending a link to a client. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
He gets this:<br />
<br />
1 error prohibited this message from being saved.<br />
<br />
    You need to attach one file.<br />
<br />
The error goes away after many tries (uploads)...<br />
<br />
We haven&#039;t made any mods to the server and this is fairly new.<br />
<br />
The email accounts haven&#039;t change so I don&#039;t have a lot of leads.<br />
<br />
Anyone has ever seen this?<br />
<br />
Thank you,<br />
<br />
D]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Editing Group "External Users" Message Settings</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 16:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/editing-group-external-users-message-settings.1959/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/editing-group-external-users-message-settings.1959/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (J. A. Duke)</author>
      <dc:creator>J. A. Duke</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#039;m trying to change the Message Access Permission - Message Access Permission from &quot;Only Specified Recipients can access&quot; to &quot;Only Specified Recipients and Local Users can access&quot;.  But whenever I try that, I receive this error banner after clicking Save: &quot;Please remove all users from the group before changing local&quot;.<br />
<br />
Can you explain why I would need to remove all users and how I can accomplish this with a default External Users group?<br />
<br />
I want to change the default setting so when a client...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/editing-group-external-users-message-settings.1959/" class="internalLink">Editing Group &quot;External Users&quot; Message Settings</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Provisioning new users via Okta</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/provisioning-new-users-via-okta.1956/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/provisioning-new-users-via-okta.1956/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Pascal de Vries)</author>
      <dc:creator>Pascal de Vries</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We have successfully set up Okta SAML authentication with LiquidFiles.<br />
<br />
Currently, I create the new users manually in LF and in Okta and then, the login with Okta works.<br />
<br />
Is it possible to automatically provision the user in LF with JIT or some other method? Currently, if the user does not exist in LF, I get a &quot;User could not be created&quot; error in LF.<br />
<br />
What would I need to configure to make this work?<br />
<br />
Many thanks.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Update log has errors : dpkg: error processing package tzdata (--configure)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/update-log-has-errors-dpkg-error-processing-package-tzdata-configure.1957/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/update-log-has-errors-dpkg-error-processing-package-tzdata-configure.1957/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Martin Blackburn)</author>
      <dc:creator>Martin Blackburn</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi, <br />
<br />
Yesterday, I updated LiquidFiles from 4.0.14 to 4.0.15 and I saw errors while updating.<br />
I check the term.log and found this:<br />
<br />
<div style="padding-left: 30px">dpkg: error processing package tzdata (--configure):<br />
 installed tzdata package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10<br />
...<br />
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of postgresql-14:<br />
 postgresql-14 depends on tzdata; however:<br />
  Package tzdata is not configured yet.<br />
dpkg: error processing package postgresql-14...&#8203;</div><br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/update-log-has-errors-dpkg-error-processing-package-tzdata-configure.1957/" class="internalLink">Update log has errors : dpkg: error processing package tzdata (--configure)</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using 2 different SAML methods</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 22:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/using-2-different-saml-methods.1955/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/using-2-different-saml-methods.1955/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Pascal de Vries)</author>
      <dc:creator>Pascal de Vries</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We would like to authenticate local users with SAML to our Azure tenant and external users with Okta SAML. Is there a possibility to store 2 different SAML configs? Many thanks.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Custom fields in Filedrop with validations</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 10:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/custom-fields-in-filedrop-with-validations.1950/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/custom-fields-in-filedrop-with-validations.1950/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (William)</author>
      <dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I have a filedrop that is configured with a custom field:<br />
<br />
Case number: text(&quot;Reference number&quot;), required, validate(&quot;^[1-9][0-9]{5}$&quot;, &quot;Must be a number containing 6 digits, beginning with a digit greater than zero.&quot;)<br />
<br />
Any value within the &quot;Case number:&quot; field presented on the file drop is accepted. Should this be performing validation or am I missing some setting?]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Resend a message and/or to other recipients</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/resend-a-message-and-or-to-other-recipients.1949/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/resend-a-message-and-or-to-other-recipients.1949/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Steve Young)</author>
      <dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Say I send a message and attachments to <a href="mailto:a@abc.com">a@abc.com</a>. Before it expires can I resend it to <a href="mailto:a@aa.com">a@aa.com</a>?<br />
<br />
Secondly, before it expires, can I send/forward it to <a href="mailto:b@bb.com">b@bb.com</a>?<br />
<br />
Assuming the 2nd user meets the Auth requirements of the 1st one.<br />
<br />
Thank you.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&gt; character in private message truncates the text</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/character-in-private-message-truncates-the-text.1948/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/character-in-private-message-truncates-the-text.1948/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Rob Huston)</author>
      <dc:creator>Rob Huston</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Has anyone seen an issue in v3.7 where if you use a &gt; (greater than sign) in the body of a private message, it truncates all text from the &gt; on?]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Logging to Syslog: Command execution</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/logging-to-syslog-command-execution.1945/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/logging-to-syslog-command-execution.1945/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Pascal de Vries)</author>
      <dc:creator>Pascal de Vries</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We have enabled logging to Syslog and our Corporate Security guys are really happy with what they see as the logging of LiquidFiles is quite verbose.<br />
<br />
The only thing that is missing for them is when someone (e.g. root) logs into the console and then executes commands. While the login and logout is logged in the Linux section of the log, the commands executed are not. Is there a way to log any executed commands?<br />
<br />
Many thanks.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Restrict API Usage</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 19:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/restrict-api-usage.1943/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/restrict-api-usage.1943/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Paul Hirose)</author>
      <dc:creator>Paul Hirose</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Is there a way to limit which users (preferably by group) can use which (or any) API?<br />
All users get an API key (whether they know it or not).  I use the API for administrative purposes so I can&#039;t globally disable them.  But can I restrict API access to only certain users, api-keys, or IP list?<br />
<br />
Thank you,<br />
PH]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LiquidFiles Updates show "License used by another hostname"</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 06:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/liquidfiles-updates-show-license-used-by-another-hostname.1942/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/liquidfiles-updates-show-license-used-by-another-hostname.1942/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Pascal de Vries)</author>
      <dc:creator>Pascal de Vries</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I have setup LiquidFiles 4.0.7 and successfully licensed it. The License page shows<br />
<br />
Licensed (Public) Hostname: secureshare.mydomain.com<br />
<br />
Validating the license works.<br />
<br />
All is green and license valid (It is a site license). But on the Update page, instead of showing me available updates it shows &quot;License used by another hostname&quot; although we are exactly using the public host name which is licensed. We have got the relevant URLs white-listed for updates an licensing.<br />
<br />
Can you give any...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/liquidfiles-updates-show-license-used-by-another-hostname.1942/" class="internalLink">LiquidFiles Updates show &quot;License used by another hostname&quot;</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>swap file</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/swap-file.1939/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/swap-file.1939/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (JoLodewyckx)</author>
      <dc:creator>JoLodewyckx</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Yesterday I was in trouble with migrating to our new vm (OVF on esxi).<br />
Services that didn&#039;t start and weird behavior.<br />
<br />
However, when rolling out a new machine with lesser specs (3Gb ram, 2 cpu&#039;s) resolved the issue.<br />
When we configerd the ip, first user, nfs storage, we turned off the machine, increased the ram and cpu&#039;s and it happened again. However, this time around we noticed that the swap file filled our entire root fs.<br />
<br />
So after increasing the diskspace, we noticed that by default the...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/swap-file.1939/" class="internalLink">swap file</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
