<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Feature Requests</title>
    <description>Anything you wish to see added to LiquidFiles</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:44:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>LiquidFiles Forum</generator>
    <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/forums/feature-requests/</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/forums/feature-requests/index.rss"/>
    <item>
      <title>Shares - Email Notifications Mapped to Action types</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/shares-email-notifications-mapped-to-action-types.1988/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/shares-email-notifications-mapped-to-action-types.1988/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Justin Marsh)</author>
      <dc:creator>Justin Marsh</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We just started using the <b>Shares </b>feature and our users were wondering if it&#039;s possible to have certain changes/uploads/deletion send emails not all (global) and every type of action send an email? It would be neat to see more granular control over the notifications in <b>Shares</b>.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shares - Include Recycle Bin deletion in logs</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/shares-include-recycle-bin-deletion-in-logs.1987/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/shares-include-recycle-bin-deletion-in-logs.1987/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Justin Marsh)</author>
      <dc:creator>Justin Marsh</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We recently started using the Shares feature and I noticed the log does not include the retention recycle bin delete log. Could this be added? Or am I missing something?<br />
<br />
Image examples:<br />


	<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/attachments/193/" target="_blank">View attachment 193</a>
	
<br />
<br />
My co-worker got the deletion email this weekend. But, no log?<br />


	<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/attachments/191/" target="_blank">View attachment 191</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Resetting the Login Limit Counter in Search Results</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/resetting-the-login-limit-counter-in-search-results.1985/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/resetting-the-login-limit-counter-in-search-results.1985/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (AEIT)</author>
      <dc:creator>AEIT</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I reviewed the documentation but couldn&#039;t find any information on resetting the login limit counter, aside from the fact that this feature was implemented in version 4.2. There’s no guidance on how to actually perform the reset.<br />
<br />
One of my users accidentally locked himself out, even though we utilize LDAP authentication. I searched for &quot;Nick&quot; to avoid scrolling through the entire user list and noticed the warning message indicating that his account was locked due to too many failed login...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/resetting-the-login-limit-counter-in-search-results.1985/" class="internalLink">Resetting the Login Limit Counter in Search Results</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow user to disable download receipt</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/allow-user-to-disable-download-receipt.1983/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/allow-user-to-disable-download-receipt.1983/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Philippe Lizon)</author>
      <dc:creator>Philippe Lizon</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Some users do not want to receive a download receipt. <br />
Having an option to disable this feature when sending a message, or once for all in user parameters would be great.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add option to sanitize filenames as they are uploaded</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 20:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-option-to-sanitize-filenames-as-they-are-uploaded.1982/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-option-to-sanitize-filenames-as-they-are-uploaded.1982/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (David M)</author>
      <dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We are using an actionscript to copy some files to an smb server, but are running into issues if a linux or mac user creates a file with characters in the name that are not supported in Windows.<br />
<br />
On a linux system this is a perfectly valid filename:<br />
Moz:illa?Pro&quot;d&quot;uc&lt;&gt;t\s.xlsx<br />
<br />
The example filename above is an exaggeration but we do frequently get multiple files at once that look something like this:<br />
&quot;PIR6SS7SDB37:  (REQUEST FOR ANSWERS)?.PDF&quot;<br />
I am assuming that these files were created on a...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-option-to-sanitize-filenames-as-they-are-uploaded.1982/" class="internalLink">Add option to sanitize filenames as they are uploaded</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proxmox / Synology and qemu-guest-agent support</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 17:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/proxmox-synology-and-qemu-guest-agent-support.1979/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/proxmox-synology-and-qemu-guest-agent-support.1979/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Dan Domnick)</author>
      <dc:creator>Dan Domnick</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The qemu-guest-agent is a common helper daemon, which is installed in a guest OS on a hypervisor. It is used to exchange information between the host and guest, and to execute command in the guest.<br />
<br />
In Proxmox VE, the qemu-guest-agent is used for mainly three things:<br />
<ol>
<li>To properly shutdown the guest, instead of relying on ACPI commands or windows policies</li>
<li>To freeze the guest file system when making a backup/snapshot (on windows, use the volume shadow copy service VSS). If the...</li>
</ol><br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/proxmox-synology-and-qemu-guest-agent-support.1979/" class="internalLink">Proxmox / Synology and qemu-guest-agent support</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add sort feature by size and/or filter feature in Admin / Data pages</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-sort-feature-by-size-and-or-filter-feature-in-admin-data-pages.1978/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-sort-feature-by-size-and-or-filter-feature-in-admin-data-pages.1978/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Philippe Lizon)</author>
      <dc:creator>Philippe Lizon</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[In Admin Data / attachements or Data / Messages pages, the list cannot be sorted by size. When an admin wants to find big messages or attachement, it&#039;s a problem.<br />
In the same spirit, having a way to filter only non expired messages/attachements would help too.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add user quota info in top bar of users menu</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 14:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-user-quota-info-in-top-bar-of-users-menu.1977/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-user-quota-info-in-top-bar-of-users-menu.1977/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Philippe Lizon)</author>
      <dc:creator>Philippe Lizon</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Users have no way to verify the usage of their user quota, so they are sometimes blocked when they try to upload a new attachment in a message.<br />
<br />
A simple display of their user quota usage in the top menu would be great]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Concurrent/Simultaneous Sessions</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 17:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/concurrent-simultaneous-sessions.1655/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/concurrent-simultaneous-sessions.1655/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (NNN)</author>
      <dc:creator>NNN</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
A recent pen test has brought up the issue that multiple concurrent/simultaneous sessions can exist for a user. It is suggested that this should not be allowed. Is this something that can be implemented as an option? i.e. only one active session per user. Either the user is prompted to kick out the other session or is just blocked from logging in until the other session ends. If the latter it could go hand in hand with my other feature request of session inactivity timeouts...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/concurrent-simultaneous-sessions.1655/" class="internalLink">Concurrent/Simultaneous Sessions</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow users to add signature to their messages</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/allow-users-to-add-signature-to-their-messages.484/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/allow-users-to-add-signature-to-their-messages.484/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (David)</author>
      <dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We would lke our users to create an email signature for their messages. This will allow them to use the same signature they use in their normal email client.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>View Aliases of account</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 09:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/view-aliases-of-account.1924/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/view-aliases-of-account.1924/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (David M)</author>
      <dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A user account that has been aliased by others should be able to see a full list of who has aliased them and possibly be able to remove them.<br />
<br />
Use case:<br />
Filedrop created for <a href="mailto:devteam@example.com">devteam@example.com</a><br />
<br />
Added <a href="mailto:devteam@example.com">devteam@example.com</a> as an alias for Alice, Bob and Carol.<br />
<br />
Alice, Bob, and Carol, can all see the email notification that is sent out to the <a href="mailto:devteam@example.com">devteam@example.com</a> distribution list, and any one of them can log in to their own accounts and download any...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/view-aliases-of-account.1924/" class="internalLink">View Aliases of account</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Option to send confirmation email to filedrop sender</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2025 16:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/option-to-send-confirmation-email-to-filedrop-sender.1974/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/option-to-send-confirmation-email-to-filedrop-sender.1974/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (David M)</author>
      <dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello,<br />
<br />
I would like there to be a checkbox available to send a Confirmation email to the filedrop sender when they send.<br />
<br />
There should be a corresponding email template that is used that looks almost exactly like the message received by the recipient but it would say &quot;Filedrop Submission Confirmation&quot; across the top.<br />
It would not have a &quot;Download files&quot; or a &quot;view message&quot; button.<br />
<br />
I am using a python action script to accomplish this right now but the resulting email is not very nice...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/option-to-send-confirmation-email-to-filedrop-sender.1974/" class="internalLink">Option to send confirmation email to filedrop sender</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add option to not send notification emails to people CCed on a System Filedrop</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2025 15:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-option-to-not-send-notification-emails-to-people-cced-on-a-system-filedrop.1975/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-option-to-not-send-notification-emails-to-people-cced-on-a-system-filedrop.1975/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (David M)</author>
      <dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We are using system file drops to receive files/applications/forms from the public. These are pretty high volume.<br />
<br />
We have a shared mailbox email addresses as the recipients of these Filedrops.<br />
<br />
We need about 5-10 people to be able to access the submissions to each of these filedrops. Currently we are using aliasing to manage who can access these messages because we don&#039;t want these people&#039;s individual email mailboxes to be inundated with filedrop submission notifications.<br />
<br />
Assigning aliases...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/add-option-to-not-send-notification-emails-to-people-cced-on-a-system-filedrop.1975/" class="internalLink">Add option to not send notification emails to people CCed on a System Filedrop</a>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Admin "Light" Role</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/admin-light-role.1922/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/admin-light-role.1922/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Gary Schultz)</author>
      <dc:creator>Gary Schultz</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I submitted a feature request for a Share Admin role. Another optionmight be an Admin &quot;Light&quot; Role. This role woudl have the ability to manage Shares, Pool Files and Filedrops. The Men woudl show <br />
<br />
Configuration &gt; Shares<br />
Configuration &gt; Pool Files<br />
Configuration &gt; Filedrops<br />
<br />


	<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/attachments/170/" target="_blank">View attachment 170</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Share Creation Role</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/share-creation-role.1918/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/share-creation-role.1918/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Gary Schultz)</author>
      <dc:creator>Gary Schultz</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[For one of our uses cases staff need to create two hundred shares with each share having an unique external customer permission. Currently in LiquidFiles this would require sysadmins to manage the two hundred shared folders. Our need is to have a share creation role with the following features:<br />
<ul>
<li>Create shares for which they become the default owner</li>
<li>Can tag internal users as owners or members</li>
<li>Can tag external users as members</li>
<li>Users can only see shares they are tagged as...</li>
</ul><br />
<a href="https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/share-creation-role.1918/" class="internalLink">Share Creation Role</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automatic file cleanup in "Shares"</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/automatic-file-cleanup-in-shares.1883/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/automatic-file-cleanup-in-shares.1883/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ognyan LIpnichanski)</author>
      <dc:creator>Ognyan LIpnichanski</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Dear Developers,<br />
<br />
I just want to ask if it&#039;s possible to extend the functionality of &quot;Shares&quot; by adding a new option for how many days to keep files there before deleting them. I believe we can do that with a shell script on the server, but it will be more convenient to do this as simple as a single option in the web interface of the Edit Share page.<br />
<br />
I have attached a demo of the UI as i imagined it.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Forwarding Attachments/Messages</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 14:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/forwarding-attachments-messages.1968/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/forwarding-attachments-messages.1968/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (CBHB)</author>
      <dc:creator>CBHB</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[It would be great, if after receiving attachments via a secure message or a filerequest, if you could seamlessly  attach them to a new secure message without having to download them to your device first.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Simple addition to Daily Status Email</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 17:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/simple-addition-to-daily-status-email.1961/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/simple-addition-to-daily-status-email.1961/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (German Rodriguez)</author>
      <dc:creator>German Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I would like to suggest a small addition to the Daily Status Email. Please include whether the system requires an update.<br />
<br />
Maybe like in the Version row:<br />
<span style="font-family: 'Courier New'">Version:  v4.1.3 (update available v4.1.4)</span><br />
<br />
Oh, and another small addition would be in the System Uptime row:<br />
<span style="font-family: 'Courier New'">System Uptime: 7 days, 22:47 (reboot required)</span><br />
<br />
Thank you for your consideration.<br />
-German]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iOS App Login</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 18:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/ios-app-login.1969/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/ios-app-login.1969/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (CBHB)</author>
      <dc:creator>CBHB</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We&#039;re going to be rolling out a Liquid Files install soon, and while I&#039;d love to introduce the iOS app to our users, currently I just can&#039;t recommend it due to the lack of a required login/lock each time you open the app . I would really love to see something similar to password management apps, or authenticator apps where you have to either re-enter your phone passcode or use biometrics to access the app when you click on it.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Support other ACME Compliant Certificate Providers</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 06:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/support-other-acme-compliant-certificate-providers.1966/</link>
      <guid>https://forum.liquidfiles.com/threads/support-other-acme-compliant-certificate-providers.1966/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Luke Sorcelli)</author>
      <dc:creator>Luke Sorcelli</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi Team,<br />
With the next reduction in Certificate Lifetime looming, I wondered if it is possible to integrate other Certificate providers like DigiCert directly with LiquidFiles.<br />
<br />
Is there anything planned? Or do you have other ways to automate the management of Certificates within the appliance?<br />
<br />
Best Regards<br />
Luke]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
